Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42189858›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

Unraveling the complexity of nurses' quality of life: A Fuzzy-Set Qualitative Comparative Analysis (fsQCA) approach to the interplay of psychological, occupational, and social factors.

Xu Jun, Li Shasha, Mao Dandan

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Xu JunNingbo Municipal Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM), Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, China.ORCID 0009-0002-8636-4085
Li Shashadepartment of medicine, Huzhou University, Huzhou, Zhejiang Province, China.
Mao DandanNingbo Municipal Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM), Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimThis study aimed to explore the interplay among occupational stress, psychological distress, social support, burnout, and work-family conflict in relation to the quality of life (QOL) of nurses.

methodsA total of 503 nurses from two tertiary-level hospitals participated in an online survey. Data were collected on psychological distress, occupational stress, social support, burnout, work-family conflict, and quality of life. Fuzzy-set Qualitative Comparative Analysis (fsQCA) was conducted to identify configuration pathways associated with high and low QOL, thereby providing a nuanced understanding of the causal complexity underlying these outcomes.

resultsFour configuration pathways were identified as conducive to high QOL: (H1) low burnout, low occupational stress, and high social support; (H2) low work-family conflict, low burnout, low occupational stress, and low psychological distress; (H3) high social support, low work-family conflict, low occupational stress, and low psychological distress; and (H4) high social support, low work-family conflict, low burnout, and low psychological distress. Conversely, two pathways were associated with low QOL: (L1) high occupational stress, high psychological distress, high work-family conflict, and low social support; and (L2) high occupational stress, high psychological distress, high work-family conflict, and high burnout.

conclusionNurses' QOL is critically influenced by occupational and psychological stressors, work-family conflict, and social support. Addressing these factors through targeted interventions may reduce burnout and psychological distress while enhancing well-being and job satisfaction.

Indexed as

Burnout, ProfessionalNursesOccupational StressQuality of LifeAdultFemaleFuzzy LogicHumansMaleMiddle AgedPsychological DistressRole ConflictSocial SupportSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID42189858
PMCPMC13210195

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.