Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42189840›Full record

ReviewThe Journal of animal ecology2026

Multiple routes to territory inheritance in Florida Scrub-Jays (Aphelocoma coerulescens).

Sarah K Beres, Tori D Bakley, Jeremy Summers, John W Fitzpatrick, Sahas Barve

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Journal of animal ecology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sarah K BeresUniversity of Nebraska Lincoln, Lincoln, Nebraska, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-9996-4709
Tori D BakleyArchbold Biological Station, Venus, Florida, USA.
Jeremy SummersUniversity of Rochester, Rochester, New York, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9739-4207
John W FitzpatrickArchbold Biological Station, Venus, Florida, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6330-8403
Sahas BarveArchbold Biological Station, Venus, Florida, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5840-8023

Funding

Archbold Biological Station
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In many animals, being the dominant owner of a territory is a pre-requisite for reproductive success. Acquisition of territory by inheritance, where at least a portion of the new (breeding) territory is acquired from the natal territory, characterizes many social animals and offers multiple benefits over dispersing away from natal ground. Territory dynamics change rapidly and are difficult to objectively quantify. Additionally, little is known regarding the non-dispersive sex's potential to inherit. We spatially analysed decades of territory maps to identify all nontrivial instances of natal territory inheritance in first-time breeding Florida Scrub-Jays (Aphelocoma coerulescens) and compared initial reproductive success of those that gained breeding status through any form of inheritance versus by other means. Among inheritors, we studied how first-time territory acquisition strategies differed between the sexes. Between 1982 and 2024, 139 out of 1014 first-time breeders gained significant natal territory through inheriting the entire natal territory upon the death of both parents, pairing with an adjacent, widowed neighbour and incorporating some natal ground, or pairing with a novice disperser and budding off of their natal territory (or some combination of two). Among all breeders that inherited substantial portions of natal territory, males did so about twice as often as females (97 vs. 42 instances, respectively). Birds that inherited natal territory did not have higher initial reproductive success than those that did not inherit. Comparing reproduction among birds who inherited, males and females did not differ either. Proportions of territory gained from the natal territory differed markedly between the sexes. Males gained a significantly higher percentage of their natal territory than females, and inherited territory made up a greater portion of their new territories. Males and females took different routes to inheritance: females showed higher plasticity in their acquisition strategy and more frequently paired with neighbouring, experienced widows on large territories, while males more commonly established new, relatively small territories with dispersing, novice females. Our study demonstrates the value in objectively quantifying field-gathered spatial data, as it revealed a previously unidentified trend of opportunistic female dispersals with beneficial fitness consequences.

Indexed as

PasseriformesSongbirdsTerritorialityAnimalsFemaleFloridaMaleReproductioncooperative breedingdispersalgender dynamicsterritory acquisitionterritory inheritance

Identifiers

PMID42189840
PMCPMC13322170

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.