ArticlePLOS digital health2026
PANDIA: Personalized neuro-symbolic multimodal fusion for interpretable neonatal pain assessment.
Article in PLOS digital health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Effective pain assessment in infants aged 0-3 months is a critical challenge in neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) and family medicine clinics, where self-reporting is impossible and current observational tools remain subjective and inconsistent. This paper presents PANDIA (Personalized Adaptive Neuro-symbolic Data-fusion for Infant Assessment), a novel multimodal AI system that combines hierarchical representation learning, graph-based inter-modal reasoning, meta-learning personalization, and symbolic concept-bottleneck explanations for robust infant pain assessment. Unlike transformer-centric approaches, PANDIA employs lightweight CNN/TCN backbones with a graph neural network for inter-modal fusion, achieving clinical interpretability through explicit concept bottlenecks and symbolic reasoning. Our federated learning framework enables privacy-preserving multi-site collaboration while meta-learning adaptation provides personalized assessment with minimal per-infant data. Evaluated on 2,847 infants across four datasets, PANDIA achieves 87.3% accuracy with 92.1% clinician acceptance rate for explanations, achieving a 12.4% accuracy improvement over the best baseline, consistent across all four datasets and an independent out-of-distribution test set, while maintaining fewer than 30M parameters for edge deployment. The proposed system offers a structured and interpretable step toward deploying explainable AI in early-life pain management, with potential to improve care quality and support medical decision-making. Key limitations include the retrospective validation design, dataset heterogeneity across collection sites, and the need for prospective clinical trials before deployment in live clinical settings. All code, trained models, preprocessing pipelines, and supplementary materials are fully publicly available without restriction at: https://github.com/oussama123-ai/pandia. The NICU-MM dataset is available upon request subject to an ethical data use agreement; the access procedure is detailed in Section 4.1.1.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.