ArticlePloS one2026
A novel approach for the EEG-driven assessment of divided attention through mutual information theory: A case study at the wheel.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Monitoring how attention is distributed across concurrent task demands is fundamental in daily life contexts such as mobility, education and industrial control. However, existing neurophysiological measures, typically based on univariate EEG markers, are sensitive to generic cognitive load, visual complexity, or motor activity, and therefore lack specificity for attentional splitting. Here, we introduce the Attentional Split Index (ASI), a novel EEG-based metric that employ Mutual Information (MI) theory, designed to quantify the coordinated modulation of multiple neurometrics that emerges when attention is divided across tasks. Twenty-five participants completed a realistic driving protocol combining a main driving task in two different environments (Urban, Highway) with four types of attentional-split demands, i.e., Focused, Auditory Continuous Performance Test (ACPT), Matrix, Surrogate Reference Task (SURT). Traditional neurometrics (parietal alpha, inverse frontal beta, frontal theta/beta ratio) exhibited partial sensitivity to task demands but failed to selectively reflect attentional splitting. In contrast, the ASI showed a robust and systematic increase across conditions, distinguishing not only explicit multitasking segments but also subtler differences between Urban and Highway focused driving. Eye-tracking and subjective distraction rating showed a strong and significant correlation with the ASI (Urban: rET = 0.515 and rSUB = 0.744; Highway: rET = 0.357 and rSUB = 0.673; all p < 10-2), confirming high behavioural and phenomenological coherence. Surrogate analyses demonstrated that ASI effects were absent when temporal coordination across neurometrics was artificially disrupted, and that real ASI exceeded surrogate values in the vast majority of participants during multitasking but not during eyes-open baseline. Together, these findings establish the ASI as a specific, robust, and ecologically coherent neural marker of attentional splitting, with promising implications for neuroergonomics and next-generation adaptive human-machine systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.