ArticlePLOS global public health2026
Targeting a future generation free from female genital mutilation: A mixed-methods quasi-experimental study of an awareness intervention in central Tanzania.
Article in PLOS global public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Female genital mutilation (FGM) persists in Tanzania, with the Dodoma Region having the country's second-highest prevalence. This study evaluated a community-based educational intervention aimed at increasing FGM awareness and encouraging its abandonment among young adults (15-19 years) in Chamwino District, Dodoma, an important yet often overlooked group for fostering intergenerational change. We conducted a mixed-methods study with a primary quasi-experimental component: a single-arm, baseline-to-endline survey with a multi-stage cluster sample of 452 young adults who completed follow-up from schools and hospitals. Secondary components included a clinical audit of 3,770 delivering mothers to determine FGM prevalence and in-depth interviews with ten young adult mothers who had undergone FGM. The primary outcome was the change in the mean awareness score, analyzed using a paired t-test, with linear regression estimating associations with participants' demographics. Changes in binary secondary outcome measures were analyzed using McNemar's test, and the association between them was assessed with the chi-square test. The mean awareness score increased by 15.04 percentage points from 44.08% (SD = 15.85) at baseline to 59.12% (SD = 16.85), p < .001. At endline, 96.5% believed FGM is harmful, 50.9% reported its continuation, 97.6% knew it violates the human rights of girls and women, and 95.8% expressed a desire for abandonment. About 7.3% of women self-reported positive FGM status at baseline, while 16.6% were observed in 9-months. Qualitative analysis yielded three themes: 1) The hidden system, 2) Blood and lies, and 3) Intergenerational revolt. This theory-informed, community-engaged intervention significantly improved awareness and attitudes among more than 1,700 community members. However, qualitative findings revealed a persistent "hidden system" and a "critical power gap" among young adults, indicating awareness alone is insufficient. Sustainable abandonment requires integrating awareness campaigns with strategies that address structural power dynamics.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.