ArticlePloS one2026
Potential reasons for the decline of new HIV cases among people who inject drugs (PWID) in Kyrgyzstan.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
There has been a declining trend in the number of reported cases of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) among people who inject drugs (PWID) in Kyrgyzstan. The local HIV and public health community has suggested that this decline may be driven by interventions targeting HIV transmission among PWID, changes in drug use patterns, or possible underreporting of new HIV cases. The present study aims to examine these hypotheses using a deterministic compartmental model. Three intervention scenarios were evaluated to assess their impact on PWID population trends, HIV incidence, and case reporting. Scenario I (baseline) included needle and syringe exchange programmes, opioid substitution therapy, behavioural interventions, and pre-exposure prophylaxis, collectively referred to as preventive interventions, alongside antiretroviral therapy (ART). Scenario II excluded preventive interventions while maintaining ART. Scenario III excluded both preventive interventions and ART. The model results suggest that the decline in PWID may be a key factor contributing to the reduction of the HIV epidemic in this group. While preventive interventions and ART are unlikely to have been the primary drivers of HIV incidence trends, they appear to have played a meaningful role in reducing the overall HIV burden. Furthermore, the model indicates that observed trends in reported HIV incidence are likely to reflect changes in testing behaviour rather than actual fluctuations in the number of new infections.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.