ArticleJMIR formative research2026
Telehealth by Home Monitoring and Video Consultation for Children With Cystic Fibrosis: Qualitative and Quantitative Study.
Article in JMIR formative research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Clinical outcomes for patients with cystic fibrosis have improved over the last decades, with a focus on enhancing the quality of life for children and their families. These improvements are expected to reduce the need for in-hospital visits, allowing for alternative care provisions that further enhance their quality of life. Telehealth can decrease the number of in-hospital visits and disruptions to everyday life. Objective: This study aims to assess the feasibility of home monitoring with subsequent video consultations and to explore the experiences of families and health care professionals. Methods: We recruited 12 children with cystic fibrosis (>6 y) and their parents from the Cystic Fibrosis-Center Copenhagen. The 5-month intervention consisted of alternately standard care visits and telehealth care visits. Telehealth care visits consisted of home monitoring, with automatically transmitted data to the hospital-based electronic health record. Home monitoring included spirometry, weight, and oxygen saturation, conducted with parental support, along with a video consultation. To monitor lung infections during telehealth care visits, all participants were encouraged to send in a sputum sample beforehand. Families completed preintervention and postintervention questionnaires about time spent, sense of security, and usability of home monitoring devices. We also collected data on families' and health care professionals' experiences with telehealth care visits through semistructured interviews after the intervention. Results: All 12 (100%) approached children and their parents accepted to participate. Standard care visits caused full-day absences for 8 (73%) children and 10 (91%) parents, compared to only 1 (8%) child and their parents during telehealth visits. More than 70% of children and their parents rated the oxygen saturation device (n=9, 75%) and weighing scale (n=11, 92%) as "very easy" to use after the intervention. However, 50% (n=6) found the home spirometry device "difficult" or "acceptable" to use, possibly due to device errors. We identified 4 main themes in the interviews: benefits of telehealth, disadvantages of telehealth, prerequisites for telehealth to be successful, and next steps toward telehealth. Conclusions: Home monitoring with automatically transmitted data to the hospital-based electronic health record and video consultations was feasible despite identified concerns regarding technical issues with home spirometry devices.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.