In one paragraphArticle in Kidney360, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from itWhat it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
2 · The registryThe trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
3 · Its place in the literatureWho cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
4 · The recordCorrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
5 · Who and what moneyAuthors and funding
18 authors.
Francisco LopesCologne Excellence Cluster on Cellular Stress Responses in Aging-Associated Diseases (CECAD), Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-2714-4229 Daniel Martinez-MartinezInstitute of Clinical Sciences, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital Campus, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-8468-1357 Martin R SpäthCologne Excellence Cluster on Cellular Stress Responses in Aging-Associated Diseases (CECAD), Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-1624-0055 K Johanna R Hoyer-AlloCologne Excellence Cluster on Cellular Stress Responses in Aging-Associated Diseases (CECAD), Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Sebastian StrublDepartment II of Internal Medicine and Center for Molecular Medicine Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-0278-4307 Sadrija CukoskiDepartment II of Internal Medicine and Center for Molecular Medicine Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-6427-177 Luisa KniepsDepartment II of Internal Medicine and Center for Molecular Medicine Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Susanne BrodesserCologne Excellence Cluster on Cellular Stress Responses in Aging-Associated Diseases (CECAD), Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-5631-0663 Heike GöbelInstitute for Pathology, Diagnostic and Experimental Nephropathology Unit, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-0171-7025 Günter SchwarzInstitute of Biochemistry, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-2118-9338 Bernard M van den BergDepartment of Internal Medicine (Nephrology) and Einthoven Laboratory of Vascular and Regenerative Medicine, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Ton J RabelinkDepartment of Internal Medicine (Nephrology) and Einthoven Laboratory of Vascular and Regenerative Medicine, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Bernhard SchermerCologne Excellence Cluster on Cellular Stress Responses in Aging-Associated Diseases (CECAD), Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-5194-9000 Thomas BenzingCologne Excellence Cluster on Cellular Stress Responses in Aging-Associated Diseases (CECAD), Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Roman-Ulrich MüllerCologne Excellence Cluster on Cellular Stress Responses in Aging-Associated Diseases (CECAD), Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-6910-0745 Andreas BeyerCologne Excellence Cluster on Cellular Stress Responses in Aging-Associated Diseases (CECAD), Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-3891-2123 Filipe CabreiroCologne Excellence Cluster on Cellular Stress Responses in Aging-Associated Diseases (CECAD), Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-3696-4843 Felix C KoehlerCologne Excellence Cluster on Cellular Stress Responses in Aging-Associated Diseases (CECAD), Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-9269-7420 Funding
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft 390661388Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft EXC 2030 -390661388Else Kröner-Fresenius-Stiftung 2020_EKEA.121Leverhulme Trust RPG-2022-299Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 102532/Z/12/Z, 102531/Z/13/A
6 · The paper itselfAbstract
key pointsBeneficial diets changed the composition of gut microbiota in an ischemia-reperfusion injury‑dependent manner in rodents. Taxonomic and functional profiling revealed a central role of Lachnospiraceae , a main producer of microbially derived short-chain fatty acids. Comparative bulk transcriptomics suggested the metabolic use of these bacterial products as an additional energy source in kidneys of protected mice.
backgroundOn one hand, dietary interventions are known for their pivotal role in regulating diversity, composition, and function of the gut microbiome. On the other hand, specific diets show an immense potential in preventing kidney injury from various damaging stimuli in rodents, and recent findings, in turn, highlight a central role of gut microbiota in kidney health and disease.
methodsThree protective dietary regimens-a fasting-mimicking diet, a diet depleted in sulfur-containing amino acids, and caloric restriction-were examined in parallel in a rodent model of ischemia-reperfusion injury (IRI). To delineate the diet-induced effect on gut microbiota in response to ischemic kidney damage, we used comparative shotgun metagenomics for taxonomic and functional profiling. We further examined the renal metabolic response using comparative transcriptomics to unravel the interplay between gut microbiota and kidney protection.
resultsBeneficial dietary preconditioning strategies changed the composition of gut microbiota in an IRI-dependent manner. Using ternary plots to investigate the role of dietary interventions over time before and after ischemic insult, we detected a central role of Lachnospiraceae that commonly expanded in response to renal IRI in dietary preconditioned mice. Further functional profiling of gut microbiota in our model revealed an increase in plasma levels of bacterial-derived short-chain fatty acids in diet-induced kidney protection. Comparative bulk transcriptomics in our model, in turn, pointed toward the metabolic use of these bacterial-derived short-chain fatty acids in kidneys of protected mice.
conclusionsBecause proximal tubules lack sufficient glycolytic capacity, products of microbial metabolism may serve as an additional energy source to fulfill their high demands when withstanding ischemic damage. Our data shed light on a close interplay between gut microbiota and diet-induced kidney protection calling for further research at the crossroads of microbiology, metabolism, and molecular nephrology.
Indexed as
Acute Kidney InjuryCaloric RestrictionDietGastrointestinal MicrobiomeKidneyReperfusion InjuryAnimalsDisease Models, AnimalMaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BLacute renal failureAKIcell survivalischemiaischemia–reperfusionischemic renal failuremetabolismproximal tubule
Identifiers
PMID42189604
PMCPMC13641456
What OpenQuestion holds
Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390