Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42189519›Full record

Observational studyJAMA neurology2026

Plasma eMTBR-tau243 and %p-tau217 for Biological Staging of Alzheimer Disease.

Gemma Salvadó, Kanta Horie, Nicolas R Barthélemy, Suzanne E Schindler, Shorena Janelidze, Anna Orduña Dolado, Divya Bali, Richard J Perrin, John C Morris, Tammie L S Benzinger and 8 more

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in JAMA neurology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Gemma SalvadóClinical Memory Research Unit, Department of Clinical Sciences Malmö, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Kanta HorieThe Tracy Family SILQ Center, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri.
Nicolas R BarthélemyThe Tracy Family SILQ Center, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri.
Suzanne E SchindlerDepartment of Neurology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri.
Shorena JanelidzeClinical Memory Research Unit, Department of Clinical Sciences Malmö, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Anna Orduña DoladoClinical Memory Research Unit, Department of Clinical Sciences Malmö, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Divya BaliClinical Memory Research Unit, Department of Clinical Sciences Malmö, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Richard J PerrinDepartment of Neurology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri.
John C MorrisDepartment of Neurology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri.
Tammie L S BenzingerDepartment of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri.
Brian A GordonDepartment of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri.
Erik StomrudClinical Memory Research Unit, Department of Clinical Sciences Malmö, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Niklas Mattsson-CarlgrenClinical Memory Research Unit, Department of Clinical Sciences Malmö, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Sebastian PalmqvistClinical Memory Research Unit, Department of Clinical Sciences Malmö, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Jacob W VogelSciLifeLab, Department of Clinical Sciences Malmö, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Randall J BatemanThe Tracy Family SILQ Center, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri.
Rik OssenkoppeleClinical Memory Research Unit, Department of Clinical Sciences Malmö, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Oskar HanssonClinical Memory Research Unit, Department of Clinical Sciences Malmö, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Biological staging of Alzheimer disease (AD) can improve diagnostic accuracy and prognostic assessment. However, existing approaches often require invasive procedures and specialized infrastructure, limiting their routine clinical use. Objective: To develop and validate a plasma-based biological staging model that closely mirrors an amyloid and tau positron emission tomography (PET)-based staging system. Design, Setting, and Participants: This observational longitudinal study included the research BioFINDER-2 cohort as the main cohort and the Knight Alzheimer Disease Research Center (ADRC) cohort as an independent validation cohort, with data acquired from November 2019 to January 2025 and from September 2007 to March 2020, respectively. Participants ranged from cognitively unimpaired (CU) to experiencing mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and dementia with AD or other neurodegenerative diseases. All individuals had both plasma biomarkers available. A Knight ADRC subsample had neuropathological data available. Data were analyzed from December 2024 to July 2025. Exposures: Plasma endogenously cleaved microtubule-binding region tau containing residue 243 (eMTBR-tau243) and phosphorylated tau at threonine 217 expressed as a percentage of its unphosphorylated form (%p-tau217). Main Outcome and Measures: The primary outcomes were PET-based biological staging according to the revised Alzheimer's Association criteria, clinical criteria, and biomarker levels assessed cross-sectionally and longitudinally. Results: The BioFINDER-2 main cohort included 872 participants, with an additional 156 participants in the Knight ADRC cohort for independent validation. In the BioFINDER-2 cohort, participants included 383 CU participants, 182 participants with MCI, 151 with AD dementia, and 156 participants with non-AD neurogenerative diseases (mean [SD] age, 72.8 [9.2] years; 438 women [50.2%]; 516 [59.2%] apolipoprotein E [APOE-E4] carriers). A plasma-based model with %p-tau217 and eMTBR-tau243 was derived, which demonstrated high concordance with established PET-based stages (C index, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.90-0.92) and was associated with clinical stage within the AD continuum (C index, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.82-0.86). In the validation cohort, concordance with PET-based stages was high (C index, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.87-0.94), as was concordance with clinical stage (C index, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.82-0.89). Concordance between fluid- and PET-based staging models was higher with this study's %p-tau217 and eMTBR-tau243 model than with a staging model using %p-tau217 alone, especially improving the intermediate or C stage (A+TMOD+) classification. In the neuropathology subsample, plasma staging was strongly aligned with autopsy-confirmed AD pathology using the Alzheimer Disease Neuropathologic Change scale (area under the curve, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.91-1.00). Conclusions and Relevance: In this longitudinal study, a plasma-based biological staging model incorporating %p-tau217 and eMTBR-tau243 showed strong concordance with PET-based staging, correlated with clinical severity and biomarker progression, and aligned with neuropathological categorization. This scalable, minimally invasive approach could facilitate broader implementation of biological staging in clinical practice and could enhance participant selection for disease-modifying treatments and clinical trials.

Indexed as

Alzheimer Diseasetau ProteinsAgedAged, 80 and overBiomarkersCognitive DysfunctionCohort StudiesDisease ProgressionFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesMalePhosphorylationPositron-Emission TomographyBiomarkersMAPT protein, humantau Proteins

Identifiers

PMID42189519
PMCPMC13213595

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.