ArticleJMIR mHealth and uHealth2026
Exploring Consumers' Situational Snacking Behaviors Using a Mobile App: Longitudinal Cohort Study (FOODLOOP) Among Millennials in the Netherlands.
Article in JMIR mHealth and uHealth, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Consumers are increasingly moving away from the traditional 3-meal-a-day eating routine to a pattern where they are snacking throughout the day to fulfill dietary needs, a trend known as "snackification." Snacking depends on a variety of product-, context-, and consumer-specific determinants, but consumers' long-term snacking behaviors in light of these determinants have remained little studied. Objective: This study aims to enhance understanding of consumers' snacking behaviors by capturing longitudinal real-world situational snacking behaviors. As snackification is highly prominent in the Netherlands, and especially among millennials (born between 1980 and 2000), Dutch millennials were used as a case study. Methods: FOODLOOP studied situational snacking behaviors of a cohort of 264 Dutch millennials over the course of a year through a time-series structure. Data were collected on 12 nonconsecutive days, divided over the 4 seasons, using the mobile app Traqq (Department of Human Nutrition and Health of Wageningen University) and following the principles of ecological momentary assessment. Results: On average, 4.52 snacks were consumed per day, of which 64% were more healthful snacks, including coffee, tea, fruit, and bread products. Snacking was mostly driven by the food choice motives liking and appetite, as well as hunger and thirst, convenience, and pleasure. Most snacking occurred at home, with others, in the afternoon, and in spring. Dutch millennials with children consumed more snacks than Dutch millennials without children, and Dutch millennials born between 1980 and 1990 consumed more snacks than Dutch millennials born between 1990 and 2000. Conclusions: Our study shows that situational snacking determinants are essential for understanding consumers' real-world snacking behaviors, as Dutch millennials' snacking behaviors differ given product-, context-, and consumer-specific determinants, and are not restricted to specific motives, locations, social settings, or times, congruent with the ongoing snackification trend. We also demonstrate that a mobile app following the principles of ecological momentary assessment is a highly valuable methodological tool to gather longitudinal data on consumers' situational snacking behaviors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.