ArticlePharmacoEconomics - open2026
A Micro-costing Study of Community-Based Primary HPV Self-Sampling and Triage Test for Cervical Cancer Screening in Rural Cambodia.
Article in PharmacoEconomics - open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCommunity-based human papillomavirus (HPV) self-sampling can expand cervical cancer screening coverage in rural settings, but local programmatic cost evidence is limited.
methodsWe conducted an activity-based micro-costing study from the healthcare system perspective to estimate start-up (January 2022-February 2023) and implementation (March-December 2023) costs of a community-based HPV self-sampling screen-triage approach in Siem Reap Province, Cambodia. Resource use and unit costs were measured using direct observation, semi-structured interviews with program staff, and review of budgets and financial reports. All costs were converted to 2024 US dollars.
resultsBetween January 2022 and December 2023, 7524 women were screened; 359 (4.77%) tested HPV-positive and 312 of 359 (86.91%) completed triage during the study period. Total programmatic cost was US$204,507.14, yielding an average cost of US$27.18 per woman screened and US$569.66 per HPV-positive case identified. Laboratory testing was the largest cost component (55.01% of total programmatic cost), followed by the community-based self-sampling activity (31.12%). Estimated incremental unit costs for triage options were US$3.69 for visual inspection of cervix with acetic acid (VIA), US$16.42 for partial HPV genotyping (types 16 and 18), and US$32.92 for colposcopy per woman receiving the respective triage test.
conclusionsCommunity-based HPV self-sampling can be delivered at moderate programmatic cost in rural Cambodia, with overall costs driven primarily by laboratory testing and community-based screening delivery. These findings provide inputs for budgeting and planning scale-up of HPV screening from a healthcare system perspective in Cambodia.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.