ReviewDermatology and therapy2026
Biological Photoprotection: A Review of its Mechanisms, Evidence, and Clinical Implications.
Review in Dermatology and therapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Biological photoprotection refers to the enhancement, preservation, or mimicry of the skin's intrinsic defense systems to prevent or mitigate damage induced by solar and environmental stressors. Unlike conventional sunscreens, which primarily act by reducing photon penetration, biological photoprotection targets the downstream molecular and cellular responses triggered by these exposures. It is achieved by incorporating nonfiltering photoprotective ingredients (PINGs) into sunscreens, which act on key biological pathways involved in skin damage and recovery. Emerging evidence suggests that these ingredients may provide additive protection when combined with ultraviolet (UV) filters, particularly in mitigating oxidative damage, supporting DNA repair, and modulating inflammatory and pigmentary responses. However, the current evidence base remains limited, with many studies characterized by small sample sizes, short durations, and heterogeneous methodologies. Taken together, biological photoprotection represents a complementary, but still evolving, dimension of modern photoprotection. Further research is required to establish standardized evaluation methods and to determine its clinical relevance under real-world conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.