ArticleJournal of autism and developmental disorders2026
Automated Quantification of Affect Synchrony: Links to Autism Risk and Social Communication in Infancy.
Article in Journal of autism and developmental disorders, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeInterpersonal affect synchrony (IAS), the moment-to-moment coordination of emotional expressions in parent-child interactions, is a key marker of early social development. However, scalable methods for quantifying IAS and examining its link to Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) are limited. This study aimed to evaluate whether automated, computer-vision-based quantification of IAS could capture early dyadic interaction patterns linked to an elevated likelihood of later ASD outcomes.
methodsWe analyzed video recordings of 70 mother-infant dyads at elevated risk for ASD (aged 6-14 months). IAS was quantified using a validated computer vision pipeline benchmarked against manual coding. Clinical Best Estimate (CBE) diagnoses at 18-24 months determined ASD outcomes. Associations between IAS, maternal positive responsiveness, and concurrent social-communicative functioning (assessed via the CSBS) were examined. Classification models incorporating dyadic metrics were compared to models relying solely on infant behavior.
resultsInfants later diagnosed with ASD exhibited significantly lower IAS, despite higher maternal positive affect. IAS independently predicted concurrent social-communicative functioning. Classification models incorporating dyadic metrics demonstrated more balanced and robust performance in identifying ASD risk compared to models based solely on infant behavior.
conclusionAutomated quantification of IAS provides a reliable, scalable approach to capture early dyadic interaction patterns associated with ASD risk. These findings highlight the potential of targeting parent-infant synchrony in early screening and intervention strategies, offering a promising direction for objective, behavior-based assessments in infancy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42189369What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.