Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42189364›Full record

ArticleBehavior genetics2026

Heritability of Functional Literacy: Evidence from a Classical Twin Design.

Nikita Kolachev, Galina Kovaleva

Abstract readTwin Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Behavior genetics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Nikita KolachevDepartment of Psychology, HSE University, Armyanskiy per. 4, c2, Moscow, Russian Federation. nkolachev@hse.ru.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3214-6675
Galina KovalevaIndependent Researcher, Moscow, Russian Federation.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Functional literacy-the ability to apply reading, mathematical, and scientific knowledge in authentic contexts as operationalized by the PISA framework-is a key predictor of educational attainment, labour-market outcomes, and economic growth. Despite extensive behavioral-genetic research on cognitive ability, the heritability of competency-based literacy measures remains largely unexamined, particularly outside Western populations. The present study addresses this gap by providing the first twin-based heritability estimates for PISA-type functional literacy from Russia. Participants were 114 twin pairs (50 monozygotic [MZ], 64 dizygotic [DZ]; age 14-15) identified within a nationally representative sample of 33,050 eighth-grade students assessed on the Russian Electronic School platform. A bifactor item-response theory model derived scores for a general cognitive ability factor and three domain-specific factors (mathematical, reading, and scientific literacy). Classical twin structural-equation modelling decomposed phenotypic variance into additive genetic (A), shared environmental (C), and non-shared environmental (E) components. The AE model provided the best fit across all phenotypes. Heritability estimates were substantial: functional literacy = 0.76 [95% CI: 0.67-0.85], mathematical literacy = 0.72 [0.59-0.84], reading literacy = 0.69 [0.56-0.82], and scientific literacy = 0.71 [0.59-0.82]. Shared environmental contributions were negligible and non-significant in all models. The twin sample was broadly representative of the source population, with only small mean differences in functional and mathematical literacy. These findings extend the behavioral-genetic architecture of cognitive ability to competency-based assessments and demonstrate its robustness in a non-Western educational context. Limitations include modest sample size, photo-based zygosity assignment, and absence of molecular genetic data.

Indexed as

LiteracyAdolescentCognitionFemaleGenetics, BehavioralHumansMalePhenotypeReadingRussiaTwins, DizygoticTwins, MonozygoticFunctional literacyIntelligenceMathematical literacyReading literacyScientific literacyTwin study

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.