Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42189336›Full record

ReviewAnimal cognition2026

Designing research interfaces for non-human minds: a biocentric design approach for animal cognition research.

Tom S Roth, Ilyena Hirskyj-Douglas, Juan Olvido Perea-García

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Animal cognition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Tom S RothAnimal Behaviour & Cognition, Department of Biology, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2985-120X
Ilyena Hirskyj-DouglasAnimal-Computer Interaction Group, School of Computing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, Scotland. Ilyena.hirskyj-douglas@glasgow.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6950-0570
Juan Olvido Perea-GarcíaUniversity Institute for Health and Biomedical Research (IUIBS), University of Las Palmas de Gran Canaria (ULPGC), Las Palmas, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6559-0652

Funding

European Research Council 101221157Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades,Spain Beatriz Galindo 807301
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The last few decades have indubitably advanced comparative research with non-human participants, often thanks to the implementation of digital interfaces. Nonetheless, the top-down application of anthropocentric designs - fitting animals to human-centered technology and scenarios - has gained almost unquestionable acceptance. This approach presents potential limitations regarding data quality and its impact on participants, caregivers, and researchers alike. We critically assess this situation, proposing the adoption of a bottom-up biocentric approach in which computer systems and test paradigms center around the animals' behavior and cognition rather than vice versa. We combine this proposal with insights from iterative design to create biocentric computer apparatuses. By embracing a biocentric perspective, researchers can align study designs with animals' natural tendencies rather than adapting the animals to fit methodologies and computer systems initially designed for humans. This approach recognizes ecological and cognitive factors unique to each species, prompting researchers to question whether current paradigms effectively capture the cognitive phenomena they intend to measure. As comparative research advances, incorporating more flexible, biocentric methodologies could yield more scientifically robust and ethically sound findings. While digital technologies remain a cornerstone of animal cognition research, we advocate for innovation beyond training animals towards human-centric paradigms. This shift invites a more nuanced and respectful understanding of animal cognition, aligning research objectives with the genuine interests and welfare of non-human participants.

Indexed as

CognitionResearch DesignAnimalsHumansBiocentricCognitionComparativeDigitalIterative design

Identifiers

PMID42189336
PMCPMC13282201

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.