ReviewJournal of gastrointestinal cancer2026
Colorectal Cancer Screening in Malaysia: Understanding the iFOBT-to-Colonoscopy Gap.
Review in Journal of gastrointestinal cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundColorectal cancer (CRC) remains a major public health burden in Malaysia. Although the national immunochemical faecal occult blood test (iFOBT) screening programme has expanded substantially in recent years, completion of diagnostic colonoscopy following a positive iFOBT result remains persistently low.
objectivesThis commentary examines the persistent iFOBT-to-colonoscopy gap in Malaysia and proposes an integrated conceptual framework to guide interventions that improve diagnostic follow-up. DISCUSSION: National and community-based studies demonstrate increasing iFOBT uptake but consistently suboptimal colonoscopy completion rates despite meaningful detection of colorectal cancer and polyps. Existing evidence suggests that fear, procedural anxiety, financial and logistical barriers, poor awareness, fragmented referral systems, and weak care coordination contribute to attrition along the screening pathway. To address these challenges, this commentary integrates the Health Belief Model (HBM) with the socio-ecological model (SEM) to illustrate how behavioural beliefs are influenced by interpersonal, organisational, community, and policy-level factors. The framework highlights the importance of coordinated interventions including patient navigation, reminder systems, provider engagement, digital referral tracking, community outreach, and public-private collaboration.
conclusionImproving colonoscopy completion after positive iFOBT results requires a coordinated multi-level systems approach that addresses both behavioural and structural barriers to strengthen continuity across the CRC screening continuum.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42189327What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.