ArticleClinical & experimental metastasis2026
Local control and dose selection for lung cancer brain metastases treated with radiosurgery: an artificial intelligence model.
Article in Clinical & experimental metastasis, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Therapeutic hybrid intelligence with neural and knowledge-based expert reasoning for SRS: an AI model for breast cancer brain metastases.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Clinical and radiological outcomes after Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for lung cancer brain metastases are heterogeneous, and prescription dose selection is often guided by experience rather than individual patient and tumor specific features. A data-driven approach that links dose to quantitative local control and adverse effect predictions could improve planning and follow-up strategies. We performed a retrospective single-center cohort study of lung cancer brain metastases treated with GKRS at the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (2014-2024). Using routinely available clinical, tumor, and dosimetric variables, we trained a tumor-level Random Survival Forest to predict Local Control and Dose Selection for Lung Cancer Brain Metastases after GKRS treatment. Internal validation used leakage-resistant patient-level grouped cross-validation. Performance was assessed using Harrell's concordance index (C-index) and integrated Brier score (IBS). A connected dose-sweep decision layer evaluated predicted local control across a clinically feasible margin dose grid and selected the dose associated with the most favorable predicted profile at prespecified horizons. The survival model demonstrated good internal performance (C-index 0.83; IBS 0.15). A baseline dose imitation model predicted historical margin dose with low error (OOF MAE 1.59 Gy). The integrated decision layer generated individualized local control trajectories and returned horizon-specific local control probabilities and model-based prescription dose recommendations. An Artificial Intelligence framework integrating time-to-event prediction with outcome-linked dose sweeping can provide individualized GKRS decision support for lung cancer brain metastases by delivering quantitative local control forecasts and model-based dose recommendations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42189324What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.