ArticleBrain topography2026
Improved Somatotopic Consistency of EEG Source Localization Using a Personalized Segmentation-Free Head Model.
Article in Brain topography, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) are widely used to assess the responses of somatosensory pathways and the central nervous system; however, the spatial resolution of EEG-based source localization is limited. This study examined whether a personalized segmentation-free head model combined with a sparse inverse solver could resolve finger-wise somatotopy without relying on functional MRI or magnetoencephalography. Sixteen healthy volunteers received electrical stimulation of the median nerve, ulnar nerve, and individual fingers, while SEPs were recorded using a 65-channel EEG. For each subject, high-resolution MRI was used to construct both conventional tissue-segmented and segmentation-free head models. Forward fields were computed using a finite difference method, and P20/N20 sources were estimated using orthogonal matching pursuit. Localization differences were evaluated as distances from reference coordinates reported in fMRI studies and compared with those obtained using a standard FEM-based pipeline with a distributed inverse solution. The segmentation-free model consistently reduced localization differences relative to literature-based reference coordinates by up to 2.9 mm. Across all stimulation targets, source-location differences (10-15 mm) were comparable to or smaller than those obtained using the conventional pipeline. Finger stimulation revealed clear somatotopic progression from the thumb to the little finger. These findings indicate that personalized segmentation-free modeling improves the spatial consistency of EEG-based source localization across multiple somatosensory targets. Rather than implying intrinsic enhancement of EEG spatial resolution, the results highlight the contribution of forward-model refinement to reducing systematic localization bias and enabling noninvasive assessment of somatotopic organization in the primary somatosensory cortex.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.