ArticleJournal of neurology2026
Identification of prognostic biomarkers in a large cohort of patients with LGMD R2.
Article in Journal of neurology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
25 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundLimb-girdle muscular dystrophy R2-dysferlin related (LGMD-R2) is a progressive muscle condition with marked variability in disease course, making prognosis challenging. Quantitative MRI (qMRI) has emerged as a complementary tool that may detect progression earlier and more precisely. Integrating different data modalities is challenging with conventional approaches, and artificial intelligence (AI) can help overcome this. Our aim is to develop robust models capable of predicting clinical progression in LGMD-R2 by incorporating AI-based techniques into the analysis pipeline.
methodsData from 188 COS 1 participants were analysed. Disease progression was assessed using the North Star Assessment for Limb Girdle type Muscular Dystrophies (NSAD). Ambulatory individuals with a maximum NSAD ≥ 20 were included, and progression trajectories were identified through hierarchical clustering. Feature selection was performed using a machine learning pipeline, and top predictors were entered into stepwise logistic regression to build clinical-only and combined clinical-MRI models.
resultsTwo stages of progression were identified, a fast one with a mean three-year loss of 14.4 NSAD points, and a moderate one, with a mean loss of 3.8 NSAD points. The combined model achieved better balanced accuracy than the clinical-only one (83.7% vs 78.7%). Key predictors in the combined model were disease duration and fat content measures in the anterior thigh and gracilis muscle, while the clinical model included disease duration, creatine phosphokinase (CK), and 10 m walk/run test velocity.
conclusionsProgression in LGMD-R2 can be grouped into distinct clinical trajectories. Individuals at a faster stage of progression were younger, had shorter disease duration, higher CK, greater weakness, and relatively preserved vastus intermedius and gracilis muscles. AI enabled efficient integration of heterogeneous data, and qMRI biomarkers provided complementary information that improved predictive accuracy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.