SynthesisTechniques in coloproctology2026
The impact of the number of stapler firings on anastomotic leakage in minimally invasive rectal surgery: risk factor or technical marker of complexity? A systematic review, meta‑analysis, and metaregression.
Synthesis in Techniques in coloproctology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAnastomotic leakage is a major complication after minimally invasive anterior resection for rectal cancer. The number of stapler firings for rectal transection has been suggested as a modifiable risk factor, but its independent role and optimal threshold remain unclear.
objectiveTo evaluate the impact of the number of stapler firings on anastomotic leakage after rectal surgery and to assess the influence of surgical and patient-related variables. DATA SOURCES: A comprehensive search of PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Ovid MEDLINE was performed. STUDY SELECTION: Studies reporting anastomotic leakage rates stratified by stapler firing count (one, two, or three or more) were included. INTERVENTION(S): Rectal transection with one or more stapler firings during minimally invasive anterior resection for rectal cancer.
main outcome measuresIncidence of anastomotic leakage according to stapler firing (SF) count.
resultsTwenty two studies including 8,725 patients and 784 anastomotic leakage events were analyzed. A single stapler firing was associated with a significantly reduced risk of anastomotic leakage compared with two stapler firings (odds ratio 0.57, 95% confidence interval 0.39-0.83), three or more stapler firings (odds ratio 0.28, 95% confidence interval 0.16-0.51), and two or more stapler firings (odds ratio 0.46, 95% confidence interval 0.34-0.63). The risk of anastomotic leakage was lower with fewer than three stapler firings compared with three or more stapler firings (odds ratio 0.38, 95% confidence interval 0.30-0.48). Meta-regression identified low rectal transection and preoperative radiotherapy as significant effect modifiers. LIMITATIONS: All included studies were observational, introducing potential bias and increased heterogeneity and the certainty of evidence was low across all comparisons.
conclusionsThree or more stapler firings were consistently associated with a higher risk of anastomotic leakage. However, because the certainty of evidence was low and owing to exploratory meta-regression findings, stapler firing number appears to reflect operative complexity more than a definitively established independent causal risk factor.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.