ArticleUrolithiasis2026
A parsimonious preoperative prediction model for postoperative sepsis following upper urinary tract calculi surgery.
Article in Urolithiasis, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
We developed and internally validated a prediction model based exclusively on routinely available preoperative (pre-) parameters to identify patients at high risk of postoperative (post-) sepsis following upper urinary tract calculi surgery. A retrospective cohort of 260 patients treated between May 2024 and April 2025 was analyzed. Candidate predictors were selected using least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression with the one-standard-error rule (λ.1se), followed by multivariable logistic regression modeling. Model performance was evaluated in terms of discrimination, calibration, and clinical utility. Among the included patients, 43 (16.5%) developed postoperative sepsis. The final model incorporated four predictors: stone count ≥ 2 (OR = 3.25, P = 0.006), perirenal fat stranding (OR = 3.08, P = 0.006), pre-positive urine nitrite (OR = 4.29, P = 0.003), and pre-positive urine culture (OR = 4.53, P < 0.001). The model demonstrated good discrimination (AUC = 0.878, 95% CI: 0.832-0.924). Calibration analysis using bootstrap resampling showed good agreement between predicted and observed outcomes (calibration slope = 0.923; intercept = - 0.075). Decision curve analysis indicated a favorable net clinical benefit across a wide range of threshold probabilities. This parsimonious model may facilitate early risk stratification and support perioperative decision-making; however, external validation is warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42189227What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.