Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42189194›Full record

ArticleOperative Orthopadie und Traumatologie2026

[Revision surgery for inlay, neck and head failure of hip endoprostheses with fixed metal components].

Karl-Dieter Heller, Kalliopi Brachou-Keßler, Ulrike Seybt, David Krüger

Abstract readEnglish Abstract
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Operative Orthopadie und Traumatologie, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Karl-Dieter HellerOrthopädische Klinik Braunschweig, Herzogin Elisabeth Hospital, Leipziger Straße 24, 38124, Braunschweig, Deutschland. Kd.heller@heh-bs.de.
Kalliopi Brachou-KeßlerOrthopädische Klinik Braunschweig, Herzogin Elisabeth Hospital, Leipziger Straße 24, 38124, Braunschweig, Deutschland.
Ulrike SeybtOrthopädische Klinik Braunschweig, Herzogin Elisabeth Hospital, Leipziger Straße 24, 38124, Braunschweig, Deutschland.
David KrügerOrthopädische Klinik Braunschweig, Herzogin Elisabeth Hospital, Leipziger Straße 24, 38124, Braunschweig, Deutschland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe aim of this technique is to minimize the extent of revision surgery in cases of inlay and/or head failure and fixed metal components of hip endoprostheses by replacing only the modular components, while still effectively solving the problem. In some cases, it may be justified to insert a nonprosthetic polyethylene inlay or a smaller polyethylene cup cemented into the fixed metal cup. INDICATIONS: Revision surgery for hip endoprostheses with inlay wear and fixed metal components, damage to a ceramic inlay or ceramic head, necessary head replacement due to instability, early infection or mismatch. Cementing a polyethylene inlay or polyethylene cup into the metal cup can be indicated in cases where the inlay is no longer available and the metal cup is firmly integrated and undamaged or only slightly damaged, in order to avoid major surgery and risk reduction in ill or very old patients. CONTRAINDICATIONS: The general contraindications for planned surgery apply. Local infections, bone tumors near the joint, periprosthetic fractures, cup and/or stem loosening, late infections and uncontrollable instability are also contraindications for isolated replacement of the inlay and head. SURGICAL TECHNIQUE: The joint is usually surgically exposed via the pre-existing access. After removing the prosthesis head the socket is exposed. The polyethylene or ceramic inlay is removed as gently as possible. If no compatible inlay for the existing prosthesis is available, a nonmatching inlay or a polyethylene cup can be cemented in place; in this case, the inner surface of the metal cup is roughened to ensure adequate cement bonding. With respect to head replacement, the extent of cone damage must be taken into account. In any case, revision head systems with metal sleeves are required to prevent fracture of the ceramic head due to incongruity. POSTOPERATIVE MANAGEMENT: After isolated inlay or head replacement, early functional physiotherapy with mobilization under full weight bearing on forearm crutches can usually be started on the first postoperative day.

resultsGood results can be achieved through revision surgery with isolated replacement of the prosthesis head in combination with the cementing of a polyethylene inlay into fixed metal cups. Even after 10 years there are significant increases in the scores and in 80-93% of cases, no further revision surgery is necessary. The rate of construct failure in the contact area between the inlay, cement and metal cup is less than 5%.

Indexed as

Arthroplasty, Replacement, HipHip ProsthesisProsthesis FailureHumansMetalsProsthesis DesignReoperationTreatment OutcomeMetalsCup retentionEndoprosthesisHipLiner replacementRevision hip replacement

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.