ReviewVaccines2026
Measuring Humoral Immune Responses to SARS-CoV-2: A Comprehensive Review of Serological Assays.
Review in Vaccines, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic highlighted the critical role of serological assays in understanding antiviral immune responses, monitoring vaccine efficacy, and informing public health strategies. This review provides a comprehensive overview of commonly used SARS-CoV-2 antibody detection methods, focusing on binding and neutralization assays. Antibody binding assays, including enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs), chemiluminescence immunoassays (CLIAs), lateral flow immunoassays (LFAs), and multiplex platforms, enable the rapid and high-throughput detection of immunoglobulin isotypes against various viral antigens. Neutralization assays, including live-virus, pseudovirus (PsV), and surrogate assays, offer functional insights into the ability of antibodies to prevent viral entry, though they often require higher biosafety levels and optimization. Serological assays, primarily antibody binding assays and several surrogate neutralization assays, received Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) during the pandemic, supporting seroprevalence efforts. Antibody binding assays and neutralization assays were also widely used in vaccine immunogenicity studies. Despite many standardization initiatives, assay standardization and data harmonization remain challenging and require further efforts. The choice of assay should be guided by study goals: antibody binding assays are preferred for high-throughput monitoring and epidemiological studies, while neutralization assays are essential for assessing functional immunity and variant-specific neutralization and protection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.