Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42188704›Full record

ReviewTomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.)2026

Advances and Challenges in Pharmacokinetic Modeling for PET Imaging: Compartment Models, Input Functions, and Quantitative Techniques.

James Hao Wang, Meltem Uyanik, Xue Li, Weijie Chen, Zhijin He, Caitlin Randell, Alan McMillan

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Tomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

James Hao WangDepartment of Radiology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI 53705, USA.ORCID 0009-0005-9668-4949
Meltem UyanikDepartment of Radiology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI 53705, USA.
Xue LiDepartment of Radiology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI 53705, USA.
Weijie ChenDepartment of Radiology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI 53705, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1608-0899
Zhijin HeDepartment of Radiology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI 53705, USA.ORCID 0009-0000-5756-0840
Caitlin RandellDepartment of Radiology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI 53705, USA.
Alan McMillanDepartment of Radiology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI 53705, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4502-6522

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pharmacokinetic modeling in Positron Emission Tomography (PET) imaging has become a cornerstone in cancer research, offering insights into tumor development and progression. These models facilitate the quantification of radiotracer distribution and metabolism, enabling precise measurement of physiological parameters essential for cancer diagnosis, staging, and treatment monitoring. However, accurate pharmacokinetic modeling depends on reliable input function acquisition and partial volume correction techniques to minimize biases in quantitative PET metrics. This review provides a comprehensive overview of current methodologies and advancements in pharmacokinetic modeling for PET oncology imaging. We discuss techniques for acquiring input functions, including arterial, venous, and image-derived input functions (IDIFs), along with population-based input functions (PBIFs). Their strengths, limitations, and clinical applications are critically evaluated. Additionally, we examine quantitative methods such as partial volume correction (PVC) that mitigate the spatial resolution limitations of PET, improving radiotracer quantification in small or heterogeneous tumors. Furthermore, we explore advanced kinetic modeling techniques, including compartmental models, graphical approaches, and data-driven methods, highlighting recent innovations such as machine learning and Bayesian modeling. Key areas for future research in PET pharmacokinetic modeling include integrating hybrid imaging modalities, developing robust patient-specific input functions, and leveraging machine learning to streamline modeling processes. These advancements aim to enhance the precision and clinical utility of PET imaging in oncology, leading to more personalized cancer treatment strategies.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalNeoplasmsPositron-Emission TomographyRadiopharmaceuticalsHumansRadiopharmaceuticalsarterial input function (AIF)compartmental modelingdynamic PET imagingpharmacokinetic modelingpositron emission tomography (PET)quantitative PET imagingtracer kinetics

Identifiers

PMID42188704
PMCPMC13210976

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.