ReviewTomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.)2026
Advances and Challenges in Pharmacokinetic Modeling for PET Imaging: Compartment Models, Input Functions, and Quantitative Techniques.
Review in Tomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pharmacokinetic modeling in Positron Emission Tomography (PET) imaging has become a cornerstone in cancer research, offering insights into tumor development and progression. These models facilitate the quantification of radiotracer distribution and metabolism, enabling precise measurement of physiological parameters essential for cancer diagnosis, staging, and treatment monitoring. However, accurate pharmacokinetic modeling depends on reliable input function acquisition and partial volume correction techniques to minimize biases in quantitative PET metrics. This review provides a comprehensive overview of current methodologies and advancements in pharmacokinetic modeling for PET oncology imaging. We discuss techniques for acquiring input functions, including arterial, venous, and image-derived input functions (IDIFs), along with population-based input functions (PBIFs). Their strengths, limitations, and clinical applications are critically evaluated. Additionally, we examine quantitative methods such as partial volume correction (PVC) that mitigate the spatial resolution limitations of PET, improving radiotracer quantification in small or heterogeneous tumors. Furthermore, we explore advanced kinetic modeling techniques, including compartmental models, graphical approaches, and data-driven methods, highlighting recent innovations such as machine learning and Bayesian modeling. Key areas for future research in PET pharmacokinetic modeling include integrating hybrid imaging modalities, developing robust patient-specific input functions, and leveraging machine learning to streamline modeling processes. These advancements aim to enhance the precision and clinical utility of PET imaging in oncology, leading to more personalized cancer treatment strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.