ArticleToxins2026
Design and Characterization of Recombinant and Chimeric BoNT/A Neurotoxins with Receptor-Binding Domain Grafting.
Article in Toxins, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Botulinum neurotoxins (BoNTs) act on peripheral cholinergic nerve terminals, inducing reversible muscle paralysis and profound therapeutic effects. However, their limited cell-type specificity and narrow therapeutic window have motivated the development of engineered variants. Here, a modular strategy was employed to construct full-length chimeric BoNTs, grafting receptor-binding segments from BoNT/B or BoNT/F onto the BoNT/A framework. The novel chimeras AAAF and AAFF efficiently cleaved rSNAP-25 in cell-free assays. Firstly, both toxins showed effective cellular uptake and cleaved endogenous SNAP-25 in Neuro-2a cells, with cleavage efficiencies of approximately 46% for AAAF and 73% for AAFF, highlighting the enhanced activity of AAFF. Secondly, AAAF induced faster recovery from reversible muscle paralysis compared to rBoNT/A-WT, whereas AAFF produced more sustained paralysis, with both exhibiting reduced systemic toxicity. Despite these altered pharmacological profiles, the chimeras required higher doses than rBoNT/A-WT to induce neuromuscular effects. Collectively, this study presents the design of novel chimeric BoNT/A-F proteins, characterizes their functional activities, and provides a preliminary exploration of how domain grafting affects cellular uptake, enzymatic activity, and neuromuscular pharmacodynamics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.