ReviewMembranes2026
Wastewater Membrane Bioreactors: A Comprehensive Review of Explainable Artificial Intelligence and Digital Twin Applications.
Review in Membranes, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Wastewater membrane bioreactors (MBRs) have become an important advanced treatment technology due to their ability to produce high-quality effluent suitable for discharge and water reuse. However, their broader and more sustainable application remains constrained by membrane fouling, elevated energy demand, and the operational complexity of coupled biological and membrane separation processes. This comprehensive review critically evaluates the growing application of machine learning (ML), explainable artificial intelligence (XAI), and digital twin (DT) technologies in MBR systems. Published studies on fouling prediction, energy optimization, effluent quality estimation, and intelligent operational support are critically evaluated, with explicit attention to model performance, dataset limitations, and generalizability. The reviewed literature shows that ML models, particularly ensemble methods, support vector machines, and deep learning approaches, have demonstrated strong potential for predicting major MBR performance indicators, including transmembrane pressure, permeate flux, fouling resistance, and selected effluent-quality variables. In parallel, XAI methods such as SHAP, LIME, and Anchors are increasingly being used to enhance model transparency and to reveal the dominant factors controlling process performance. Digital twin frameworks further extend this potential by enabling the integration of mechanistic understanding, online sensor data, data-driven prediction, and interpretable decision support within real-time operational platforms. Nevertheless, several barriers continue to hinder practical implementation, including the limited number of full-scale studies, the scarcity of openly accessible and standardized datasets, insufficient consideration of uncertainty and model drift, and the early-stage maturity of DT deployment in operational plants. The evidence reviewed suggests that integrating ML, XAI, and DT can substantially improve the reliability, interpretability, and operational efficiency of MBR systems. Future research should therefore focus on full-scale validation, the development of benchmark datasets, uncertainty-aware modeling, and practical deployment strategies for interpretable intelligent MBR management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.