Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42188435›Full record

ArticleMembranes2026

Validation of Analytical Results for Counter-Current Flow in Square Channels Separated by a Membrane in a Hemodialysis Module Using Experimental Module Results.

Akram Abdullah, Rathinam Panneer Selvam

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Membranes, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Akram AbdullahDepartment of Civil Engineering, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72701, USA.ORCID 0009-0008-1203-5282
Rathinam Panneer SelvamDepartment of Civil Engineering, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72701, USA.

Funding

Civil Engineering Department / University of Arkansas 123
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Counter-current flow in channels separated by a membrane has been studied by several scientists and researchers. The current study aims to analytically simulate and describe the distribution of pressure, volumetric flow rate, and velocity in square channels separated by a membrane. Consequently, the study was conducted using one-dimensional (1D) analytical solutions to achieve several objectives: avoiding the execution of experimental tests, reducing the effort required for expensive and time-consuming module design, and enabling easy observation of variations in pressure, volumetric flow rate, and velocity. The 1D analytical solution directly simulates flow in square channels separated by a membrane by solving the continuity equation and Darcy's law, through which pressure, volumetric flow rate, and velocity are calculated. Experimental results were used to validate the 1D analytical solutions. The results of the current study indicate that pressure decreases from the inlet to the outlet of the channel, while the horizontal velocity decreases from the inlet to the midpoint of the channel length and then increases toward the outlet. The 1D analytical solutions show acceptable accuracy when compared with experimental results. Consequently, these solutions can be used to explore and illustrate the distributions of pressure, volumetric flow rate, and velocity in square channels separated by a membrane, enabling the evaluation of hemodialysis prototype module performance and efficiency prior to fabrication.

Indexed as

1D analytical solutioncounter-current flowexperimental resultshemodialysismembrane

Identifiers

PMID42188435
PMCPMC13208140

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.