ArticleJournal of functional biomaterials2026
Structural Behavior Analysis of a Bone-Scaffold System According to the Elastic Modulus of Bone Cement and Pore Size in the Proximal Femur.
Article in Journal of functional biomaterials, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Bone scaffolds are porous artificial structures that replace damaged bone tissue and promote bone regeneration. In clinical settings, bone cement is used to provide initial fixation stability between the bone scaffold and surrounding bone tissue. To analyze the performance of bone scaffolds more accurately, the cement mantle should be considered. This study considers the cement mantle between the bone scaffold and surrounding bone tissue and the structural behavior according to variations in the elastic modulus of the cement mantle and the pore size of the bone scaffold. The results showed that the cement mantle energy ratio increased with increasing pore size, particularly in the femoral head and intertrochanteric region. In the femoral head with a pore size of 1.50 mm, increasing the cement mantle elastic modulus from 7 to 24 GPa reduced the mean strain energy within the bone scaffold from 3.79 μJ to 2.51 μJ, corresponding to a decrease of approximately 33.8%. These findings suggest that as cement mantle stiffness increases, external loads may not be sufficiently transferred to the bone scaffold interior, and the proportion of the load borne by the cement mantle may increase. In the femoral neck, the cement mantle energy ratio also increased with increasing pore size; however, the magnitude of this change was more limited than that in the other regions of interest. These findings highlight the mechanical importance of the cement mantle and suggest that both cement stiffness and scaffold pore size should be jointly considered to ensure appropriate load sharing for bone regeneration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.