ArticleJournal of Intelligence2026
Hidden Potential: An Exploratory Study of the Prevalence of Twice-Exceptional Students in Saudi Arabia.
Article in Journal of Intelligence, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Although twice-exceptional students are receiving more attention than before, the topic is still under-researched. This poses a major problem for this group, as a comprehensive educational policy that meets its needs can only be developed based on realistic estimates. Therefore, this study aimed to explore the prevalence of twice-exceptional students in Saudi Arabia. It also sought to investigate whether prevalence rates vary according to gender, age, and academic subject. The sample included 6875 students ranging from second to twelfth grade. These students were screened via a two-step process. First, students with potential learning disabilities based on a discrepancy of more than 1.5 standard deviations between their academic achievement in two subjects (e.g., between Arabic and math) were flagged for further assessment. Second, a giftedness test was administered to these students to screen for gifted students. The first step suggested that 23.6% of students showed indicators of learning disabilities. The intelligence test in the second stage indicated that 24.5% of students with potential disabilities may be gifted. The preliminary analysis suggests that approximately 5.9% of the sampled student population may be twice-exceptional, which represents a substantial number of underserved students. This suggests the potential value of developing educational policies and practices to meet the needs of this population, although broader replication is needed before definitive policy recommendations can be made.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.