Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42188268›Full record

ArticleJournal of Intelligence2026

Does Physical Interaction with Insight Problems Really Affect the Solution Rate?

Laura Macchi, Daniele Inglese, Laura Caravona

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of Intelligence, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Laura MacchiDepartment of Psychology, University of Milano-Bicocca, 20126 Milano, Italy.
Daniele IngleseDepartment of Psychology, University of Milano-Bicocca, 20126 Milano, Italy.
Laura CaravonaDepartment of Psychology, University of Milano-Bicocca, 20126 Milano, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Insight problems are traditionally presented in verbal or visual form; however, some research suggests that physically interacting with the problem materials may facilitate insight problem solving. In contrast, the more recent literature found no performance improvement with manipulable materials, except for spatial problems (e.g., the "Eight Coins problem"). In Experiment 1, to challenge the hypothesis that the facilitating effect of material manipulation is mainly related to spatial insight problems, two groups of participants were presented with another spatial insight problem, the "Pencil problem" (a new version of the traditional "Match problem"), either in paper format or in a physical interactive condition. The results showed no significant differences in success rates based on presentation format. Therefore, manipulating the materials does not appear to facilitate solving spatial insight problems

Indexed as

embodied cognitioninsight problem solvingmisunderstandingphysical interactionSTEM education

Identifiers

PMID42188268
PMCPMC13208192

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.