ArticleJournal of imaging2026
A Dual-Branch Deep Learning Framework with Explainability for Dental Caries Classification Using Intra-Oral Photographs and Radiographs.
Article in Journal of imaging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Diagnostic Accuracy of Artificial Intelligence for Dental Caries Detection Across Clinical Imaging Modalities: A Systematic Review and Descriptive Synthesis.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The accurate detection of dental caries is often hindered by modality-specific imaging challenges, such as illumination artifacts in intra-oral photographs and low lesion contrast in radiographs. This study proposes a comprehensive framework comprising three key components: (1) HybridAugment+, an entropy-guided adaptive augmentation strategy that applies stronger transformations to low-information images; (2) DBAttNet, a dual-branch attention network featuring illumination-reflection aware attention (IRAA) for photographs and contrast-frequency-aware attention (CFA) for radiographs; and (3) a CAM-based explainability method, selected through a systematic evaluation of five advanced techniques. This study utilized two datasets derived from public sources, comprising 639 intra-oral photographs (481 caries, 158 healthy) and 456 radiographs (268 caries, 188 healthy). These were annotated by two dentists, with established inter-rater reliability (κ = 0.82 for photographs, κ = 0.79 for radiographs). The experimental results demonstrate that HybridAugment+ improved performance over conventional augmentation by up to 8.72% on photographs and 7.67% on radiographs. Furthermore, DBAttNet achieved F1-scores of 97.90% on photographs and 95.72% on radiographs, outperforming ResNet50, InceptionV3, MSDNet, DCANet, and ARM-Net. A comparative evaluation identified XGrad-CAM as the most suitable explainability method, with optimal visualization thresholds of 30% for photographs and 20% for radiographs. Generalization experiments on ophthalmology (APTOS 2019, Messidor-2) and chest radiography datasets (Kermany CXR, NIH ChestX-ray14) demonstrated consistent performance gains over domain-specific methods (DT-Net, ConvNeXt-Tiny). These results confirm that the core design principles effectively transfer to other modalities facing analogous imaging challenges.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.