ArticleJournal of imaging2026
Computed Fluid Dynamics-Based Blood Pressure Prediction for Coronary Artery Disease Diagnosis Using Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography.
Article in Journal of imaging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Computational fluid dynamics (CFD)-based simulation of coronary blood flow provides valuable hemodynamic markers, such as pressure gradients, for diagnosing coronary artery disease (CAD). However, CFD is computationally expensive, time-consuming, and difficult to integrate into large-scale clinical workflows. These limitations restrict the availability of labeled hemodynamic data for training AI models and hinder the broad adoption of non-invasive, physiology-based CAD assessment. To address these challenges, we develop an end-to-end pipeline that automates coronary geometry extraction from coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA), streamlines simulation data generation, and enables efficient learning of coronary blood pressure distributions. The pipeline reduces the manual burden associated with traditional CFD workflows while producing consistent training data. Furthermore, we introduce a diffusion-based regression model. Specifically, the inverted conditional diffusion (ICD) model is designed to predict coronary blood pressure directly from CCTA-derived features, thereby bypassing the need for computationally intensive CFD during inference. The proposed model is trained and validated on two CCTA datasets using the Adam optimizer with a weight decay of 1×10-3, a learning rate of 1×10-5, a batch size of 100, and Huber loss. It is then evaluated on a test set of ten simulated coronary hemodynamic cases. Experimental results demonstrate state-of-the-art performance. Compared with Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM), the proposed model improves the R2 score by 19.78%, reduces the root mean squared error (RMSE) by 19.44%, and lowers the normalized root mean squared error (NRMSE) by 18%. Compared with a multilayer perceptron (MLP), it improves the R2 score by 8.38%, reduces RMSE by 4.3%, and reduces NRMSE by 5.4%. This work represents a first step toward a scalable and accessible framework for rapid, non-invasive, CFD-based blood pressure prediction, with the potential to support CAD diagnosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.