Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42188232›Full record

ArticleJournal of imaging2026

On Vision Transformer Explainability for Personal Protective Equipment Detection: A Qualitative and Quantitative Analysis.

Miriam Di Renzo, Filomena Niro, Patrizia Agnello, Marta Petyx, Fabio Martinelli, Mario Cesarelli, Antonella Santone, Francesco Mercaldo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of imaging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Miriam Di RenzoDepartment of Medicine and Health Sciences "Vincenzo Tiberio", University of Molise, 86100 Campobasso, Italy.
Filomena NiroDepartment of Medicine and Health Sciences "Vincenzo Tiberio", University of Molise, 86100 Campobasso, Italy.
Patrizia AgnelloIstituto Nazionale per l'Assicurazione Contro gli Infortuni sul Lavoro, 00144 Roma, Italy.ORCID 0009-0007-0130-8727
Marta PetyxIstituto Nazionale per l'Assicurazione Contro gli Infortuni sul Lavoro, 00144 Roma, Italy.
Fabio MartinelliInstitute for High Performance Computing and Networking, National Research Council of Italy (CNR), 87036 Rende, Italy.
Mario CesarelliDepartment of Engineering, University of Sannio, 82100 Benevento, Italy.
Antonella SantoneDepartment of Medicine and Health Sciences "Vincenzo Tiberio", University of Molise, 86100 Campobasso, Italy.
Francesco MercaldoDepartment of Medicine and Health Sciences "Vincenzo Tiberio", University of Molise, 86100 Campobasso, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-9425-1657

Funding

Istituto Nazionale per l'Assicurazione Contro gli Infortuni sul Lavoro BRiC-2024, INAIL
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The safety of workers in industrial settings is ensured through the correct use of Personal Protective Equipment (PPE). The use of such equipment can be monitored using Deep Learning (DL). Federated Machine Learning (FML) is a technique that can be used in this context to preserve the privacy of sensitive information and provide explainability for the models adopted. Explainability techniques are an essential resource for interpreting the classification performed by the model. In this regard, this study aims to evaluate, through the adoption of specific similarity indices, the robustness and consistency of the explainability algorithms adopted to identify the areas of the images that are decisive for PPE classification. The dataset consists of 1600 real images representing work environments, in which staff are portrayed both with and without Personal Protective Equipment; specifically, there are workers wearing helmets, workers wearing reflective vests, workers wearing both devices and, finally, workers without any PPE. SSIM, VIF and SCC are the most relevant indices involved in the study. In the experimental phase, their mean values stand at 0.99, 0.96 and 0.96 for the intra-client study, and 0.96, 0.91 and 0.71 in the inter-client analysis.

Indexed as

attention heatmapCLS heatmapexplainabilityfederated machine learningGrad-CAMPPEprotective equipmentrollout heatmapsafety

Identifiers

PMID42188232
PMCPMC13207956

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.