ArticleJournal of imaging2026
Automatic Polygon Annotation of Plant Objects for Training Dataset Preparation in Green Biomass Segmentation Tasks.
Article in Journal of imaging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This paper addresses the problem of automated segmentation of plant green biomass in field crop images aimed at improving the accuracy of crop and weed identification. To construct a training dataset for neural network models, an automatic annotation algorithm is proposed, enabling the generation of polygonal object masks without human intervention. The method is based on adaptive analysis of color characteristics of plant fragments with iterative narrowing of the hue range in the HSV color space, combined with an integral quality metric that accounts for the dynamics of contour area and shape. The proposed method achieved an IoU of 93.22% and a DSC of 96.30%, demonstrating a high level of agreement between automatic and manual annotations. The generated masks are used to train segmentation models of the YOLO11-seg family. Models of different scales (n, s, m, l, x) were trained and evaluated using standard metrics, including Intersection over Union (IoU), mAP@0.5, mAP@0.5-0.95, F1-score, and Precision-Recall (PR) curves. Experimental results demonstrate that models trained on automatically generated annotations achieve stable segmentation performance of plant green biomass. The best results were obtained with the YOLO11m-seg model, achieving an F1-score of 0. 772. The results confirm the effectiveness of the proposed approach and demonstrate acceptable segmentation quality, supported by both quantitative metrics and visual analysis. The developed automatic annotation algorithm can be used to expand training datasets in computer vision tasks for agricultural applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.