ArticleJournal of imaging2026
Projection-Related Bias in the Detection of Thoracic Abnormalities: A Large-Scale Analysis of the NIH ChestX-Ray14 Dataset.
Article in Journal of imaging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Chest radiography remains a cornerstone in the diagnosis of thoracic diseases. However, differences in image acquisition-particularly projection type-may influence the apparent prevalence and detectability of radiographic findings. Such differences may represent a potential source of bias in large imaging datasets used for clinical research and artificial intelligence. Importantly, projection type is closely associated with the patient's condition and may therefore reflect both technical imaging factors and underlying clinical characteristics, including disease severity. A total of 120,120 chest radiographs were available in the dataset. After applying inclusion criteria, 112,104 images were included in the primary analysis. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to assess the association between projection type and the presence of radiographic findings, adjusted for age and sex. Subgroup and interaction analyses were performed to evaluate effect modification by demographic factors. Given the large sample size, emphasis was placed on effect sizes and confidence intervals rather than statistical significance alone. Compared with posteroanterior projection, anteroposterior projection was associated with higher odds of detecting consolidation (aOR 3.27; 95% CI 3.07-3.48), infiltration (aOR 1.90; 95% CI 1.84-1.96), pleural effusion (aOR 1.66; 95% CI 1.60-1.72), atelectasis (aOR 1.63; 95% CI 1.57-1.70), and cardiomegaly (aOR 1.19; 95% CI 1.10-1.28). These associations were consistent across age and sex strata. A significant interaction between projection type and sex was observed for infiltration (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.