ArticleJournal of imaging2026
Physically Guided Attention Mechanism for Underwater Motion Deblurring via Cepstrum-Based Blur Estimation.
Article in Journal of imaging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Underwater images often suffer from mixed degradations, including motion blur, which reduce structural clarity and adversely affect downstream vision tasks. To address this problem, we propose a physically guided Transformer framework for underwater motion deblurring. The proposed method combines two-stage cepstrum-based blur estimation with a point spread function (PSF)-guided self-attention mechanism. Specifically, blur parameters are first robustly estimated through cepstrum analysis, ellipse fitting, and negative-peak refinement, and the resulting PSF is then embedded into the Transformer attention module to guide feature aggregation. On the real underwater benchmark datasets UIEB Challenge-60 and EUVP330, the proposed method achieves UIQM/UCIQE scores of 4.09/0.56 and 3.40/0.58, respectively, significantly outperforming UFPNet and Phaseformer, thereby demonstrating superior perceptual restoration in terms of sharpness, contrast, and color consistency. On the synthetic test set, the proposed method attains 24.23 dB PSNR and 0.918 SSIM, outperforming both recent deep models and classical non-blind deconvolution methods, which confirms its strong restoration fidelity and structural consistency. In the controlled water-tank experiments, the proposed method consistently achieves the best performance under different camera motion speeds, demonstrating excellent robustness and practical applicability. Overall, the proposed framework provides an effective and physically interpretable solution for underwater motion deblurring.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.