ArticleJournal of imaging2026
DiGS: Depth-Initialized Gaussian Splatting for Single-Object Reconstruction.
Article in Journal of imaging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Gaussian Splatting is a state-of-the-art technique for 3D reconstruction. In this paper, we investigate how different initialization strategies influence the optimization process within the Gaussian Splatting framework, showing that more accurate initial point clouds can greatly influence the quality of object reconstruction. We introduce the Depth-initialized Gaussian Splatting (DiGS) approach, a pipeline that leverages depth-based initialization. By incorporating depth data from a calibrated stereo camera setup, the proposed method significantly enhances model performance, particularly during the early optimization stages. DiGS is particularly effective for reconstructing isolated single objects and improving the recovery of fine-grained details. Several tests on synthetic and real-world datasets confirm the effectiveness of the proposed pipeline. To evaluate our approach, we employ objective metrics and a user study involving 20 participants to assess with human perception the quality of the proposed approach.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.