ArticleJournal of imaging2026
Phase-Domain Peak-Based Correspondence Extraction for Robust Structured-Light Imaging.
Article in Journal of imaging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Standard fringe-based structured-light processing estimates wrapped phase from phase-shifted sinusoidal images and commonly relies on phase unwrapping to obtain a globally consistent phase representation. In practical measurements, this approach may become unstable on reflective objects and under low or non-uniform illumination, where the recorded fringe signal is distorted and the recovered phase becomes unreliable. To address these limitations, we propose a correspondence extraction method based on subpixel peak localization performed directly on phase-domain images. The wrapped phase is transformed into absolute value phase profiles, Φ=|ϕw|, whose local structure follows the projected fringe pattern and is less affected by object-dependent intensity variations. The proposed method reformulates correspondence extraction as a local signal-based estimation problem in the phase-domain, thereby reducing reliance on global phase-consistency constraints at the correspondence stage. A practical advantage observed in the evaluated examples is that the method remained usable in some regions where the phase became locally flat because of low modulation, saturation, or reflective surface effects. In such regions, conventional processing relies on sufficiently reliable phase gradients and subsequent unwrapping, whereas the proposed method uses local peak geometry in the transformed phase representation. In the implementation used here, Gray-code information is employed only for pixel-wise phase extension and reference indexing, not as a spatial phase-unwrapping mechanism. The method does not require machine learning models or training data and can be integrated as a correspondence analysis stage in practical structured-light systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.