Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42188217›Full record

ReviewJournal of imaging2026

Neural Computing Advancements in Cardiac Imaging: A Review of Deep Learning Approaches for Heart Disease Diagnosis.

Tarek Berghout

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of imaging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Tarek BerghoutLaboratory of Automation and Manufacturing Engineering, Department of Industrial Engineering, Batna 2 University, Batna 05000, Algeria.ORCID 0000-0003-4877-4200

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Heart disease remains a leading cause of mortality worldwide, and timely and accurate diagnosis is crucial for improving patient outcomes. Medical imaging plays a pivotal role in this process, yet traditional diagnostic methods often suffer from limitations, including dependency on manual interpretation, susceptibility to observer variability, and inefficiency in handling large-scale data. Deep learning has emerged as an innovative technology in medical imaging, providing unparalleled advancements in feature extraction, segmentation, classification, and prediction tasks. Despite its proven potential, comprehensive reviews of deep learning methods specifically targeted at cardiac imaging remain scarce. This review paper seeks to bridge this gap by analyzing the state-of-the-art deep learning applications for heart disease diagnosis, covering the period from 2015 to 2025. Employing a well-structured methodology, this review categorizes and examines studies based on imaging modalities: Ultrasound (US), Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI), X-ray, Computed Tomography (CT), and Electrocardiography (ECG). For each modality, the analysis focuses on utilized datasets, processing techniques (e.g., extraction, segmentation and classification), and paradigms (e.g., transfer learning, federated learning, explainability, interpretability, and uncertainty quantification). Additionally, the types of heart disease addressed and prediction accuracy metrics are also scrutinized. These findings point toward future opportunities, including the study of data quality, optimization, transfer learning, uncertainty quantification and model explainability or interpretability. Furthermore, exploring advanced techniques such as recurrent expansion, transformers, and other architectures may unlock new pathways in cardiac imaging research. This review is a critical synthesis offering a roadmap for researchers and practitioners to advance the application of deep learning in heart disease diagnosis.

Indexed as

cardiovascular healthcaredeep learningheart diseasemedical imagesneural networks

Identifiers

PMID42188217
PMCPMC13207492

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.