ArticleEuropean journal of investigation in health, psychology and education2026
Gen Z Youth in the Battleground: Can AI Interventions Mitigate Risky Gaming Behaviours and Mental Health Harm?
Article in European journal of investigation in health, psychology and education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
Excessive gaming (EG) is increasingly recognised as a modifiable behavioural risk among youth, with potential implications for mental health and well-being in digitally mediated environments. This study examines excessive gaming as a behavioural exposure and AI cyber-shielding (AI-CS) as a perceived digital protective factor among Generation Z university gamers. AI-CS is conceptualised as users' perceived exposure to AI-enabled safety mechanisms embedded in gaming-related digital environments. The study investigates the associations of EG and AI-CS with four psychological outcomes: depressive symptoms (DEP), anxiety symptoms (ANX), hostile behaviours (HB), and personal well-being (PWB). Data were collected through a cross-sectional online survey of 983 university students aged 18 to 22 years from multicultural Middle Eastern backgrounds enrolled in Saudi universities. The sample included 54.2% males and 45.8% females. The proposed relationships were analysed using Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modelling (PLS-SEM). The results show that excessive gaming is positively associated with depressive and anxiety symptoms and negatively associated with personal well-being. No significant association was found between excessive gaming and hostile behaviours. AI cyber-shielding is negatively associated with depressive and anxiety symptoms and positively associated with personal well-being, but it does not significantly predict hostile behaviours. These findings indicate that excessive gaming is primarily associated with internal psychological outcomes rather than external behavioural responses. They also suggest that perceived AI-enabled safety affordances in gaming-related digital environments are associated with lower psychological distress and higher well-being. The study contributes to research on digital well-being by introducing and empirically examining AI cyber-shielding as a perception-based environmental factor associated with psychological functioning among university students.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.