ReviewEuropean journal of investigation in health, psychology and education2026
The Impact of Green Exercise on Cardiovascular and Musculoskeletal Health in Middle-Aged and Older Adults: A Scoping Review.
Review in European journal of investigation in health, psychology and education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Growing urbanization has significantly contributed to the global burden of cardiovascular and musculoskeletal diseases. Green exercise, defined as structured physical activity in natural environments, has emerged as a potential intervention to address these health outcomes. This scoping review aims to synthesize the current scientific evidence on the cardiovascular and musculoskeletal benefits of green exercise among middle-aged (35-64 years) and older adults (≥65 years), examining potential mechanisms, intervention characteristics, and practical implications. A systematic search was conducted across PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar databases. Methodological quality was assessed to contextualize the strength of the findings. The available evidence suggests potential cardiovascular benefits, particularly in blood pressure regulation and heart rate variability, supported by both high and moderate-quality studies. Regarding musculoskeletal health, high-quality evidence appears to show improvements in muscle strength, lean mass and functional capacity, as well as reductions in fat mass. While green exercise appears to offer additional psychophysiological advantages over indoor exercise, results remain mixed regarding the clinical superiority of natural versus urban outdoor settings. Notably, significant benefits were observed across diverse frequencies and durations, suggesting that a strictly optimal dose-response remains elusive due to study heterogeneity. Consequently, green exercise appears to be a promising, evidence-informed strategy for healthy aging. While it is associated with improvements in cardiovascular and musculoskeletal health, its added value over traditional settings should be viewed as a complementary factor for adherence. Future research should prioritize high-quality mechanistic trials and standardized protocols to refine clinical prescriptions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.