ArticleEuropean journal of investigation in health, psychology and education2026
Between Ideal and Actual Care: Patients' and Family Carers' Experiences of Cancer Care Relationships.
Article in European journal of investigation in health, psychology and education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Research on how patients and family carers experience their relationships with physicians and healthcare staff is limited, particularly regarding the gap between ideal expectations and actual care. This study explored patients' and carers' perceptions of the ideal care relationship, their lived experiences, and factors shaping discrepancies between expectations and reality. A total of 143 individual, face-to-face semi-structured interviews (mean age = 56.7 ± 13.2; 61.4% women) were conducted with 57 cancer patients and 86 family carers in outpatient oncology clinics in Southern Italy. Participants were recruited through purposive sampling and interviewed separately, with carers recruited as an independent group. Transcripts were analysed using Thematic Analysis of Elementary Contexts (TAEC), a mixed-methods approach combining qualitative and quantitative techniques. Methodological rigor and trustworthiness were ensured in line with COREQ reporting guidelines. Four thematic clusters emerged: "Variability in the experience," "The ideal care relationship," "Waiting times and delays in care," and "The luck of being cared for by a good physician." Oncology care experiences emerge as inherently ambivalent: supportive in interactions with clinicians, yet tension-laden due to systemic and organizational constraints. These findings suggest that strengthening patient- and family-centered care requires both relational improvements and organizational interventions aimed at reducing waiting times, enhancing care integration across fragmented pathways, and improving continuity of care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.