ArticleJournal of cardiovascular development and disease2026
Establishment of an MR-Conditional Porcine Model for Real-Time Assessment of Cerebral Blood Flow During Extracorporeal Circulation.
Article in Journal of cardiovascular development and disease, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Cerebral Hemodynamic Changes During Cardiac Surgery: A Feasibility MR Study in Piglets.NMR in biomedicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
background and purposeNeurological injury remains a major complication of pediatric cardiac surgery and is closely related to alterations in cerebral blood flow during extracorporeal circulation (ECC). However, the real-time assessment of cerebral perfusion under these conditions has been limited by the lack of magnetic resonance (MR)-compatible perfusion systems. The aim of this pilot feasibility study was to establish a porcine model enabling simultaneous cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) and real-time MR-based assessment of cerebral blood flow during simulated pediatric cardiac surgery.
methodsWe conducted a pilot study on 11 Duroc pigs (14.6 ± 1.4 kg BW), designed in iterative cycles. The experimental setup included an MR-conditional heart-lung machine and a surgical protocol closely mimicking pediatric cardiac surgery. After the initiation of CPB and hemodynamic stabilization, animals were cooled to target temperatures (20 °C or 28 °C) depending on the perfusion strategy. Structural and functional MRI, including phase-contrast imaging, arterial spin labeling, diffusion-weighted imaging, and MR spectroscopy, were performed during cooling and rewarming. Procedural feasibility, technical challenges, and optimization strategies were systematically documented.
resultsThe study successfully established a reproducible porcine model enabling MR imaging during extracorporeal circulation. Key technical challenges, including vascular access, cannulation of the ascending aorta, and blood volume management, were identified and addressed through the iterative refinement of the surgical and perfusion protocols. The use of the Seldinger technique significantly improved cannulation safety and reduced blood loss. Stable CPB conditions and target hypothermic temperatures were achieved in successfully cannulated animals. MRI acquisition during CPB was feasible, providing simultaneous structural and functional assessment of cerebral perfusion. Representative imaging data demonstrate the capability of the model to capture cerebral hemodynamics in real time.
conclusionsThis pilot study establishes a novel MR-compatible porcine model for the real-time assessment of cerebral blood flow during extracorporeal circulation. The platform provides a robust foundation for future quantitative investigations of cerebral perfusion, mechanisms of brain injury, and neuroprotective strategies in pediatric cardiac surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.