ArticleJournal of cardiovascular development and disease2026
Can an Unenhanced Reduced-Dose ECG-Gated CT of the Aorta Replace an ECG-Gated CT-Angiography for Diameter Follow-Up of the Ascending Aorta?
Article in Journal of cardiovascular development and disease, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Electrocardiogram (ECG)-gated contrast-enhanced computed tomography angiography (CTA) is the reference method for follow-up of ascending aortic aneurysms but delivers substantially higher radiation doses than ECG-gated non-contrast CT (NCCT). NCCT can be acquired at a lower dose while enabling measurements of the aortic outer diameter. This study aimed to quantify the radiation dose of both techniques and determine whether a significant difference exists in ascending thoracic aorta diameter measurements between NCCT and CTA. Eighty patients who underwent ECG-gated cardiac CT for suspected coronary artery disease were retrospectively analyzed. Three observers measured the ascending aortic diameter at the level of the pulmonary artery in a plane perpendicular to the aorta on both NCCT and CTA images. Inter-rater reliability was assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients, and paired samples t-tests were used to evaluate measurement differences. Dose-length products (DLP) were collected. Median DLP values were 16.1 mGy·cm (interquartile range 11.8-25.1) for NCCT and 190.3 mGy·cm (interquartile range 120.5-298.9) for CTA. NCCT measurements were consistently larger than CTA measurements, with mean differences of 2.1 ± 0.8 mm, 2.6 ± 0.96 mm, and 2.9 ± 1.09 mm for the senior radiologist, junior radiologist, and resident, respectively (all
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.