Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42187993›Full record

ArticleEntropy (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Information-Driven Rule Reduction in Belief Rule Bases for Complex System Modeling.

Xingzhi Liu, Haolan Huang, Yingmei Li, Zida Xia, Shutong Zhao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Entropy (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Xingzhi LiuThe School of Computer Science and Information Engineering, Harbin Normal University, Harbin 150025, China.
Haolan HuangThe School of Computer Science and Information Engineering, Harbin Normal University, Harbin 150025, China.
Yingmei LiThe School of Computer Science and Information Engineering, Harbin Normal University, Harbin 150025, China.
Zida XiaFaculty of Arts and Social Sciences, University of Sydney, City Road, Darlington, NSW 2008, Australia.
Shutong ZhaoThe School of Computer Science and Information Engineering, Harbin Normal University, Harbin 150025, China.

Funding

2025 Basic Scientific Research Operating Expenses Project for Provincial Undergraduate Universities of Heilongjiang Province 2025-KYYWF-ZR0118Key Higher Education Teaching Reform and Research Project of Heilongjiang Province SJGZB2024160Key Higher Education Teaching Reform and Research Projects of Harbin Normal University XJGYJSZ202401Key Higher Education Teaching Reform and Research Projects of Harbin Normal University XJGZ202514
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the analysis of complex engineering systems, managing uncertainty and optimizing information processing structures are critical for reliable state prediction. The Belief Rule Base (BRB) provides a powerful machine learning approach for integrating expert knowledge with uncertain information. However, mitigating the combinatorial complexity of BRBs through conventional structure simplification often causes unintended information loss, introducing systematic prediction biases that undermine reliability. To address the trade-off between system complexity and modeling accuracy, this study proposes an adaptive belief rule base framework integrating sensitivity analysis with posterior consistency calibration (BRB-ARR). First, an information-driven rule screening mechanism is developed to dynamically determine the pruning threshold based on optimized Mean Square Error (MSE) fluctuations. This method effectively filters redundant rules while avoiding the cognitive biases associated with fixed empirical values. Second, a low-dimensional optimization process is employed to readjust the parameter vector, significantly enhancing computational efficiency. Finally, a posterior calibration module is introduced to compensate for the systematic biases caused by dimensionality reduction, strictly preserving the interpretability of the core inference architecture. To validate the effectiveness of the proposed framework, experimental evaluations are conducted on petroleum pipeline networks and liquid propellant launch vehicles. In the petroleum pipeline scenario, the rule base scale is reduced by over 60 percent from 56 to approximately 20 rules, while the parameter dimensionality decreases from 338 to 122. Compared to the conventional model, the mean squared error is reduced from 0.5291 to 0.3619. Furthermore, in the liquid propellant launch vehicle case, the model achieves a prediction accuracy of 98.57 percent with a mean squared error of 0.00029 while reducing the rule scale from 441 to 109. These results demonstrate that the BRB-ARR model effectively balances structural compactness with high precision prediction, offering a novel approach to uncertainty modeling in intelligent systems.

Indexed as

adaptive rule reductionbelief rule baseindustrial safety predictionsensitivity analysis

Identifiers

PMID42187993
PMCPMC13205788

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.