ArticleEntropy (Basel, Switzerland)2026
On Intention and Fluctuations in the Coordination Dynamics of Animate Movement.
Article in Entropy (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Many of life's biggest dilemmas can be summed up as a tension between holding on and letting go. The very language evokes a notion of intentionality which, for the most part, has evaded scientific understanding. How might we even get a window into it? Important insights have come from a seemingly simple task: wiggling one's fingers to and fro to the beat of a metronome. As the metronome pace increases to some critical frequency, one coordinative pattern becomes unstable and switches spontaneously to another. Such transitions are typically preceded by critical fluctuations, a predicted feature of self-organization in complex, dynamical systems. Here we address the nature and source of these fluctuations, usually assumed to be: (1) random; (2) of external origin; and (3) of fixed magnitude. We performed an experiment in which participants were instructed to oscillate their fingers in either an in-phase or anti-phase pattern in time with a metronome and instructed them to either "hold-on" or "let-go" should they feel the pattern begin to change, yielding a 2 by 2 within-subjects design. We observed that as the metronome frequency was increased from 1.00 to 3.00 Hz, fluctuations in the relative phase between the fingers were significantly altered both by the starting coordinative pattern as well as the participant's intention to "hold it on" or "let it go". Specifically, the intention to hold on to the anti-phase pattern delayed the spontaneous transition to in-phase, an effect that was paired with increased fluctuations beyond the critical frequency. These observations were analyzed under the extended Haken-Kelso-Bunz (HKB) model which describes the non-linear stochastic dynamics of the order parameter (relative phase) as a gradient descent on a certain potential. Our analysis, in line with experimental results, suggests that intention transforms the HKB potential not only by stabilizing unstable coordination states but also (paradoxically) by increasing fluctuations around them. Such findings may offer new interpretative light on the relation between intention and fluctuations in the coordination dynamics of living things.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.