ArticleEntropy (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Strategic Risk Based Forecasting of Brent Crude Oil Prices: A Comparative Analysis of Econometric and Machine Learning Models.
Article in Entropy (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Brent crude oil prices are strategically important due to their sensitivity to geopolitical developments, financial market stress, and global monetary conditions. This study examines whether strategic risk indicators improve the forecasting performance of Brent crude oil returns within an integrated econometric and machine learning framework. Monthly data from January 2001 to December 2025 are employed, using the Global Geopolitical Risk Index (GPR), the CBOE Volatility Index (VIX), and the U.S. 10-year Treasury yield (DGS10) as key explanatory variables. Methodologically, the analysis first estimates benchmark econometric models, including ARIMAX (AutoRegressive Integrated Moving Average with Explanatory Variable) and ARIMAX-gjrGARCH (Glosten-Jagannathan-Runkle Generalized Autoregressive Conditional Heteroscedasticity, and then implements machine learning models, namely XGBoost (eXtreme Gradient Boosting), LightGBM (Light Gradient Boosting Machine), and Random Forest, to capture potential nonlinear relationships. Using sMAPE (Symmetric Mean Absolute Percentage Error), forecast performance is assessed over multiple forecast horizons under a rolling-origin framework. Across several forecasting horizons and train-test split configurations, the empirical results consistently show that machine learning techniques, especially LightGBM, offer superior out-of-sample forecasting accuracy. These findings suggest that the dynamics of Brent crude oil returns are influenced by complex and nonlinear relationships between macro-financial conditions, financial uncertainty, and geopolitical risk. The study concludes that flexible data-driven forecasting frameworks offer stronger predictive performance than benchmark econometric models under strategic risk conditions and provide useful implications for energy market risk management and policy decision-making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.