ArticleEntropy (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Temporal Properties of Cardiorespiratory Coupling in Patients with Heart Failure During the Circadian Cycle.
Article in Entropy (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Heart failure (HF) is accompanied by autonomic dysregulation and disrupted physiological rhythms, yet how cardiorespiratory coupling (CRC) reorganizes across the circadian cycle during everyday life remains incompletely characterized. We studied 24 h ambulatory ECG recordings from 88 healthy controls and 75 patients with HF. Cardiac autonomic dynamics were quantified from RR intervals using standard HRV indices and symbolic/entropy descriptors, and circadian organization was assessed with 24 h cosinor modeling. Respiratory timing was derived from ECG-derived respiration (EDR) to obtain breath-to-breath (BB) intervals and the pulse-respiration quotient (PRQ). System-level coupling was evaluated primarily as event-timing coordination using coordigram-based coordination percentages computed at two timing tolerances (ε = 0.1 s and ε = 0.2 s) over 24 h and hour-by-hour, and complemented by entropy-based timing irregularity for RR, BB, PRQ, and RR-BB cross-entropy. Patients with HF exhibited lower global HRV and reduced information content in RR dynamics, together with circadian chronodisruption characterized mainly by weaker rhythmic expression and increased inter-individual phase dispersion. CRC differences depended on both tolerance and time of day. In entropy-based profiles, RR-BB cross-entropy and RR entropy did not show hour-specific differences; instead, group separation was localized to higher early-night ApEn in BB in HF and to consistently higher daytime/early-evening FuzzEn in PRQ in controls. Together, these findings indicate a time-structured remodeling of cardiac autonomic dynamics and CRC in HF, in which autonomic function is compromised, and coupling alterations become most evident when examined at appropriate timing tolerances and with circadian (hour-resolved) resolution.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.