ArticleEntropy (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Support Size of
Article in Entropy (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We study the discrete-time amplitude-constrained additive white Gaussian noise (AWGN) channel from the perspective of near-optimal input distributions in the high-SNR, or equivalently large-amplitude, regime. While it is known that the capacity-achieving input is discrete with finitely many mass points, the precise scaling of its support size as a function of the amplitude constraint remains an open problem. In this work, we instead consider the minimal support size required to achieve capacity up to an ε-gap. We introduce the quantity Kε(A), defined as the smallest support size among discrete inputs supported on [-A,A] that achieves mutual information within ε of capacity. We show that this relaxed formulation is significantly more tractable and admits sharp characterizations in several vanishing-gap regimes. In particular, for polynomially decaying gaps, ε=A-β with β≥1, we establish that Kε(A)=Θ(AlogA) as A→∞. For exponentially small gaps, we obtain bounds of order between AlogA and A3/2. Our approach combines approximation-theoretic bounds for Gaussian mixtures with information-theoretic control of entropy via χ2-divergence, together with a wrapping argument that relates the problem to approximating the uniform distribution on a circle. Beyond the technical results, our framework provides a conceptual explanation for the variety of scaling laws observed in prior numerical studies, suggesting that these may correspond to different regimes of ε-optimality rather than intrinsic properties of the exact optimizer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.