Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42187913›Full record

ArticleEntropy (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Interplay Between Vertical and Horizontal Schemes of Computation: From Bayesian Inference to Quantum Logic via Gluing Boolean Algebras.

Yukio-Pegio Gunji, Kyoko Nakamura, Kazuto Sasai, Iori Tani, Mayo Kuroki, Alessandro Chiolerio, Andrew Adamatzky, Andrei Khrennikov

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Entropy (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Yukio-Pegio GunjiDepartment of Intermedia Art and Science, School of Fundamental Science and Engineering, Waseda University, 3-4-1 Ohkubo, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo 169-8555, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-0462-4932
Kyoko NakamuraDepartment of Fine and Applied Arts, Kyoto University of the Arts, 2-116 Uryuyama Kitashirakawa, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto 606-8271, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-3225-1384
Kazuto SasaiDepartment of Computer and Information Sciences, College of Engineering, Ibaraki University, 4-12-1 Nakanarusawa-cho, Hitachi 316-8511, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-8920-5875
Iori TaniInformation Science and Technology Center, Kobe University, 1-1 Rokkodai-cho, Nada-ku, Kobe 657-8501, Japan.
Mayo KurokiWaseda Research Institute for Science and Engineering, 3-4-1 Ohkubo, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo 169-8555, Japan.
Alessandro ChiolerioBioinspired Soft Robotics, Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia, Via Morego, 30, 16163 Genova, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-9328-2999
Andrew AdamatzkyUnconventional Computing Laboratory, University of the West of England, Coldharbour Lane, Bristol BS16 1QY, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1073-2662
Andrei KhrennikovDepartment of Mathematics, Linnaeus University, Universitetsplatsen-1, 352 52 Växjö, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-9857-0938

Funding

Japan Science and Technology Agency JPMJCR23P4
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Artificial intelligence is typically formulated as an information-processing system composed of artificial neurons, where computation is understood as recursive operations connecting inputs and outputs. However, real neural systems are materially embodied and continuously reconfigured by metabolic and physical processes, suggesting that computation cannot be reduced to fixed causal structures. In this paper, we propose a theoretical framework that captures the interplay between informational and material processes as the interaction between two computational schemes: a vertical scheme, representing fixed cause-effect relations, and a horizontal scheme, representing transformations between such relations. We show that the vertical scheme corresponds to Bayesian inference, which updates probability distributions over a fixed hypothesis space, and is consistent with the free-energy minimization principle. In contrast, the horizontal scheme is formalized as inverse Bayesian inference, which modifies the hypothesis space itself by updating likelihood structures based on experienced data. We further demonstrate that the interplay between these schemes can be expressed algebraically as a process of continuously gluing Boolean algebras. This construction yields a non-distributive orthomodular lattice, i.e., quantum logic, without invoking Hilbert space formalism. In this view, quantum logic emerges not as a static logical system but as a structural consequence of dynamically reconfiguring causal contexts. This framework provides a unified perspective in which inference is understood not only as optimization within a fixed model but also as a process that generates and transforms the model itself. It offers a formal basis for describing open-ended computation and suggests a connection to approaches such as unconventional computing and Natural Born Intelligence, where computational structures evolve through interaction with material processes. Unlike existing approaches, this framework derives quantum-logic-like structure from the continual reconfiguration of causal contexts rather than from Hilbert-space assumptions or optimization within a fixed hypothesis space.

Indexed as

Bayesian inferencecause–effect relationcomputingmaterialquantum logic

Identifiers

PMID42187913
PMCPMC13205283

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.